Ergonomics and Warehouse Staffs-Free-Samples-Myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Write a report on Ergonomics and Warehouse Staffs. Answer: Introduction: The recent world is experiencing a greater shift toward expanded market economy indication more of demand both in national as well as international economies of the world. The reason behind this are increased innovation and technology and decreased difficulty in producing more of goods and service and transporting them to distant places. These require huge production mostly in retail, industrial sectors and different service sectors. These sectors are contributing largest to the gross domestic production of nation. One such large producer company Amazing Suppliers is the topic of our discussion. The firm is well known for its production of varied goods directly to the public through virtual markets like online shopping method. Recently the firm is on the verge of booming its production stemming from greater demand and business operation. This has led to extensive working hours for the warehouse staffs who work rigorously almost 24 hours. Moreover the larger operations has also kept t he administration workers engrossed in working for almost 12 hours. This has generated considerate amount of health issues that poses serious challenge toward productivity of the workers in the long run Kogi 2012). This owes much importance due the fact that increased health problems among workers would reduce the workforce and hampered production that further affects the business growth and profitability of the firm on the face of rising demand. This evokes the importance of letting the board of directors know about the issue so that with proper policies and rules the forecasted problems can be averted in order to maintain smooth production over time. The paper aims to highlight such aspects of the problem in form of a report to the higher authority with making proper suggestions, advices and recommendations outlining the problems and its solutions. Challnges Of Warehouse Staffs Almost every developed country of the world has one shift worker among every five workers and the shift span includes 12-24 hours f working eve in nighttime. Amazing suppliers decision to make their workers work for 24 hours that creates much concern for the workers personal, social as well as professional life. Generally warehouse workers are exposed to various risks such as exposure to fire, complex and harmful chemical component, hazardous substances, electricity, gas and risks of physical injury related to manual handling of heavy equipments. Apart from these, there are some problems that is inflicting threat to the workers quite slowly through invisible and long run impact of the heavy workload. Few of the common threat for the workers committing excessive physical as well as mental work are sleeping disorder, weariness, mental illness, cardiovascular diseases, and gastrointestinal disorder (Levanon et al. 2012). Moreover the extensive research shows that excessive pressure on h ealth due to shift work poses threat of risks regarding child bearing of the women through disturbed menstrual cycle. Huge stress results from impact of night shift on the family life of workers. The phenomenon is worsened through higher rates of abortion, low weight in birth deformity and prematurity. It affects the male fertility and reproduction system as well The extensive survey of the general lifestyle of 12 hours shift workers report the problems of following side effects: Increasing rate of obesity Greater chances of heart attacks and other heart diseases Gastric and indigestion problems Higher intensity of mood swings More prone to accidents More family issues Increased diabetes Chronic fatigue Increased abuse from Substances. On the other hand, the 24 hours workers who are biggest victim of loss of sleep calls for some addition t these health risks- Loss of memory Disruptive health functioning Depressed immunity system Loss of attention Psychosis and other psychological issues. Extent And Impact Of The Problem: extent: In almost every workplace adverse health conditions related to occupation have been common leading to occupational diseases. The occurrence and severity are correlated with the extent of the exposure to factors related to physical, biological, chemical, psychological, ergonomic and mechanical. Extent of such factors is more prone to characteristics of the occupational health issues. The workers who are working for 24 hours incessantly are subject to various health issues that follows some common characteristics. Most of the complaints coming as the shift workers lowered performance are due to irritation nervous failure with chronic anxiety and more stress in the rigorous working process leading to mental deterioration. This disrupts the social and personal life of the workers creating further chain of issues feeding into the problem more. The driving reason behind such are deficit in sleep and chronic fatigue resulted from circadian rhythms, neuroticism. This is leading to higher absenteeism requiring for psychopathic drugs. The International Agency on Research on Cancer (IARC) classified that the shift work and resultant circadian rhythm disruption lead to the most dreadful disease cancer promoting malignant tumors in multi-factorial ways (Levanon et al. 2012). Common ailment extended almost every workers of group of workers are metabolic disorders evident in form of abdominal obesity, reduced cholesterol, increased glucose level are common. These combined with type 2 diabetes and cardio problem have led to higher public health risk environment in the warehouse. The rigorous shift works of the warehouse staffs as well as the administrative workers lead to break in meal time synchronizations impacting the health. The workers ignore the modification regarding their requirement of total energy intake and composition of meal. The pertain to intake unhygienic fat foods that also in improper times leading to gastrointestinal disorders and chain wise problems like fever, weakness, indigestion and infections. Impact: The very fact that severe health issues sourced from occupation can disrupt the health functioning of workers in warehouse, it can also be established that work-relatedness of diseases connected with work varies in degree based on the work. More than occupational hazards, work-related health issues are more frequent in occurrence (Levanon et al. 2012). The extrinsic factors of risk and intrinsic factors combine to interact into evident health issues. Some of them are: Behavioral responses, hypertension, psychosomatic illness, coronary heart disease, chronic respiratory diseases and locomotors disorder. The work conditions in the warehouse to which employees are exposed throughout the day often lead to aggravation of pre-existing health issues. Exposure to complex chemical substances like chlorinated hydrocarbon can generate hepatic dysfunction (Kogi 2012). Bronchial asthma can be accelerated for excessive exposure to dust. Moreover, excessive contact to inorganic mercury, cadmium and other metallic hazardous substances can aggravate the renal diseases of the staffs. Combination of occupational hazards results into synergistic impacts on the workers which is more prominently hazardous than summative individual exposures of them. Susceptibility of the workers to individuals differs based on the genetic formation as well as the occupational structures. Genetic factors play important role in individual susceptibility. Advice: The challenges affecting the health of workers evokes concern as the deterioration of workers health leads to high en, lower production and loss of output as well as supply of the company leading to greater loss of profit and market share of the firm. It is advised to the board of directors to take note of the issues that concern the health of the employees that has positive correlation with the productivity and growth of the company. The firm should be responsive to the fact and act pro-active to avert the issues in order to ascertain continued production. It can employ different tools, analysis and methods of cognitive testing in order to detect the prevalence of the problems of fatigue and sleep disorders among workers as well as assess the severity caused from long working hours.. This poses importance in order to put forward the solution and cure to the affected workers (Grajewski, Grski, Zawadzki and Hamrol 2013). Multi-latency Tests: It is tool that diagnoses disorders in sleep. It measures the elapse in time between nap period in the start of the daytime and the first sign of feeling sleepy which is also known as sleep latency. The test result helps in concluding the sleepiness that workers are affected with. Greater the sleepiness higher the speed they fall asleep. The test is useful in testing for the presence of narcolepsy This evidently differentiates between whether the staffs are inflicted with physical weariness or excessive daytime sleepiness caused from other factors. It also helps in detecting whether treatments focused at breathing disorder are effective or not. In terms if REM sleep and other brain patterns how fast one sleeps is well assessed by the test. The test conducts 4 to 5 naps with 20 minutes duration every two hours apart to study an overnight sleep pattern (Trotti, Staab and Rye 2013). The test scores falling within 5 indicates severity of the issue whereas 5-10 indicates troublesome condi tion faced by the individual. Values falling within 10-15 refers to condition that is manageable and values ranging within 15-20 indicates excellent situation of the workers (Cai et al. 2013).. These tests rightfully can help to detect the severity as well as probable population affected that would allow the firm to go for change of strategy or policies in order to produce efficiency through workers. Epworth Sleepiness Scale: Dr. Murray Johns first introduced the scale in Australia in the year 1991. It is a measure to quantify the sleepiness felt by the workers in daytime. The process follows answering of brief questionnaire. The test can help in detecting or diagnosing whether the workers suffer from sleep disorders. The questionnaire focuses on finding out the rate of falling asleep of the workers in eight different situation of daily lives of the people. The range of the probability vary from 0 to 3 (Doneh 2015). The individual scores obtained from eight different questions are summed up to derive one single number corresponding to the scale of the test. The values of the overall test falling within 0-9 are considered to be normal whereas at the extreme cases lies within 10-24 requiring immediate and thorough medical aids. The values falling between 11-15 indicates mild and moderate rate of sleep apnea and refers to severity where value lying above 16 refers to narcolepsy or severe sleep apnea (Doneh 2 015) Solution: The biggest solution to these health issues can be in form of preventing the occurrence of such problems. The prevention can be followed in three stages: Primary Prevention: This kind of prevention focuses on reducing the optimum risk that can cause severe diseases. This would require reduction in the magnitude of exposure to various hazardous substances. The reductions are required to be managed by the hygiene personnel in the industrial sectors. The reductions can be best achieved if the production technique follows transformation in the production process following technologically sound infrastructure. Elimination of substances are not end in itself as it requires usage of protective equipment that can take care of the general wellbeing of the workers exposed to working environment for 24 hours. Rotation of the shift workers based on area is also good way out (Morag and Luria 2013). Secondary prevention: The identification of the existing health problems and extent of them are very important. For this the firm can go for various testing of cognitive state of mind of the workers based on the multi sleeping latency test and Epworth sleeping scale. The scores and results obtained help the authority to know how the tedious long working hour are depreciating the human capital in terms of loss of productivity. The surveillance process is important part of this stage of prevention. Some of the issues can be indicative of failure in the first stage of prevention but at least that can be corrected in this stage with proper care policies. Tertiary Prevention: It includes the minimization of adverse impacts of the exposure to health disease through treatment and medication (Morag and Luria 2013). This targets the reduction and limitedness of the symptoms minimizing the injuries caused to body and maximize capacity to function smoothly. Recommendation Early detection of occupational diseases: The firm should be pro-active about the problems its employees are facing while contributing for the huge production it demands from them. With the help of proper medical assistance and treatment provision, the earlier detection process should be ascertained (Morag and Luria 2013). This require the firm to invest more in the health services in favor of the staffs prone to more risks due to continuous pressure and workload. Occupational ergonomics: Ergonomics is branch of science that deals with optimization of overall well-being and performance of the workers through creating understanding of the humans interaction with other elements in the system applying theory, methods, data and designs (Arezes, Dinis-Carvalho and Alves 2015). It rightly shapes up the requirements and goals of safety and health wellness to be maintained in the workplace while maintaining higher productivity (de Guimares 2015). This would help in collecting information about the situation workers face so that correct advice can be forwarded. It greatly helps in communicating with the management team so as to make improvements in the workers conditions benefiting them overall. Occupational safety and accident prevention: Maintaining the safety in the warehouse-working environment is one of the important recommendations (Carayon et al. 2015) . Prevention of accidents is also required t maintain workplace safety. The firm should be able to develop a program planned centralized to control possibility of different health hazards issues affecting the workplace efficiency (Levanon et al. 2012). This would require not only keeping the equipments and work environment free but also be ready to make others access to support different cost approach. Health education: The biggest changes the company can do is to create awareness among the employees through providing them training and making them aware of the side effects of the exposure to hazards or even rigorous working. This would allow the workers to take corrective measures to deal with own problems on the first hand (Morag and Luria 2013). The workers having proper knowledge of the outcomes of excessive working for long hours can actually help them to avoid many health issues following proper care and cure. Conclusion From the discussion it is evident that amazing suppliers are in need of huge production and this would require more workforce to be available. If the firm does not go for new employment or hiring then it has to make extensive use of the existing staffs leading to excessive workload of 24 hours shift. What has been found that over the long run this would depreciate the capability of producing efficiently by the workers and more absenteeism, drop outs would increasing hampering the production of the firm which is not viable in the phase of growing demand and expanding market share. Hence the dreadful impacts of the tedious long working hours should be identified and replaced with newer relaxed policies combined with adequate medical aids provided by the firm in conducting tests to detect the problem and treatments with proper medication. With the help of ergonomic designs the firm comes up with few policies that boosts the efficiency than reducing it. References Arezes, P.M., Dinis-Carvalho, J. and Alves, A.C., 2015. Workplace ergonomics in lean production environments: A literature review.Work,52(1), pp.57-70. Cai, S.J., Chen, R., Zhang, Y.L., Xiong, K.P., Lian, Y.X., Li, J., Shen, J.C. and Liu, C.F., 2013. Correlation of Epworth Sleepiness Scale with multiple sleep latency test and its diagnostic accuracy in assessing excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome.Chin Med J (Engl),126(17), pp.3245-3250. Carayon, P., Hancock, P., Leveson, N., Noy, I., Sznelwar, L. and Van Hootegem, G., 2015. Advancing a sociotechnical systems approach to workplace safetydeveloping the conceptual framework.Ergonomics,58(4), pp.548-564. de Guimares, B.M., 2015. Ergonomics and workplace adaptation to people with disabilities.Work,50(4), pp.607-609. Doneh, B., 2015. Epworth Sleepiness Scale.Occup Med (Lond),65, p.508. Ehrensberger-Dow, M. and O'Brien, S., 2015. Ergonomics of the translation workplace.Translation Spaces,4(1). Grny, A., 2012. Ergonomics in the formation of work condition quality.Work,41(Supplement 1), pp.1708-1711. Grajewski, D., Grski, F., Zawadzki, P. and Hamrol, A., 2013. Application of virtual reality techniques in design of ergonomic manufacturing workplaces.Procedia Computer Science,25, pp.289-301. Huang, L., Zhou, J., Li, Z., Lei, F. and Tang, X., 2012. Sleep perception and the multiple sleep latency test in patients with primary insomnia.Journal of sleep research,21(6), pp.684-692. Kogi, K., 2012. Practical ways to facilitate ergonomics improvements in occupational health practice.Human factors,54(6), pp.890-900. Levanon, Y., Gefen, A., Lerman, Y., Givon, U. and Ratzon, N.Z., 2012. Reducing musculoskeletal disorders among computer operators: comparison between ergonomics interventions at the workplace.Ergonomics,55(12), pp.1571-1585. Makhbul, Z.M., Senik, Z.C. and Abdullah, N., 2013. Ergonomics and Stress at the Workplace: Engineering Contributions to Social Sciences.Jurnal Pengurusan,37(1), pp.125-131. Meinert, M., Knig, M. and Jaschinski, W., 2013. Web-based office ergonomics intervention on work-related complaints: a field study.Ergonomics,56(11), pp.1658-1668. Morag, I. and Luria, G., 2013. A framework for performing workplace hazard and risk analysis: a participative ergonomics approach.Ergonomics,56(7), pp.1086-1100. Onen, F., Moreau, T., Gooneratne, N.S., Petit, C., Falissard, B. and Onen, S.H., 2013. Limits of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale in older adults.Sleep and Breathing,17(1), pp.343-350. Pheasant, S. and Haslegrave, C.M., 2016.Bodyspace: Anthropometry, ergonomics and the design of work. CRC Press. Radjiyev, A., Qiu, H., Xiong, S. and Nam, K., 2015. Ergonomics and sustainable development in the past two decades (19922011): Research trends and how ergonomics can contribute to sustainable development.Applied ergonomics,46, pp.67-75. Rozlina, S., Awaluddin, M.S., Hassan, S., Abdul, S. and Norhayati, Z., 2012, July. Perceptions of ergonomics importance at workplace and safety culture amongst Safety Health (SH) Practitioners in Malaysia. InProceedings of the World Congress on Engineering(Vol. 1, pp. 4-6). Trotti, L.M., Staab, B.A. and Rye, D.B., 2013. Test-retest reliability of the multiple sleep latency test in narcolepsy without cataplexy and idiopathic hypersomnia.Journal of clinical sleep medicine: JCSM: official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine,9(8), p.789. Wu, S., Wang, R., Ma, X., Zhao, Y., Yan, X. and He, J., 2012. Excessive daytime sleepiness assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and its association with health related quality of life: a population-based study in China.BMC public health,12(1), p.849.